support@tutorialsexperts.com
+1 315 765 7646
Need Consultation? Contact us
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

Order 100% Original
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

Order 100% Original
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout
Shop
Home SPD 320 SPD 320 All Assignments GCU
Awaiting product image

SPD 320 All Assignments GCU

$250

Category: SPD 320 Tags: SPD 320 All Assignments, SPD 320 All Assignments GCU, SPD 320 All Weeks Assignments GCU
  • Description
  • Reviews (0)

SPD 320 All Assignments GCU

SPD 320 Topic 1 Assessment Process to Establish Eligibility

Following the assessment process for establishing eligibility under IDEA’s disability categories ensures adherence to proper legal provisions and ethical considerations. Understanding the purpose of each assessment utilized to establish eligibility assists in the ability to execute those assessments properly.

In your brochure, identify and describe the following:

  • The five primary purposes of the special education eligibility assessment process for individuals who have or appear to have disabilities (screening and identification, eligibility and diagnosis, IEP development and placement, instructional planning, and evaluation) as explained in “NASET Assessment in Special Education Series.”
  • The stakeholders involved in the assessment process with explanations of why and how each is involved.
  • How students are identified for assessment based on IDEA’s eligibility categories.
  • Legal and ethical considerations related to the assessment process and establishing eligibility.
  • At least three components of the comprehensive eligibility assessment process used to determine if there is a documented disability.

The brochure should include graphics that are relevant to the content, visually appealing, and use space appropriately.

Provide a minimum of three scholarly references.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 2 Parent Newsletter Article

Assessments are used for many different purposes in the K-12 educational setting. For example, assessments are used during classroom instruction to measure students’ learning related to the academic content, and different assessments are used to measure students’ overall cognitive, physical, or social-emotional abilities. Regardless of the assessment type, there are specific terms that are often used related to assessments. It is often the responsibility of the special education teacher to explain assessment terminology to families.

Understanding the terminology used in the formal assessment of students who have or may have a disability is a vital first step for collaboration with families. Having such knowledge will assist families in understanding the uses and limitations of specified assessments. Teachers are then able to collaborate and consult with families in a productive manner to inform student-based decision making.

Student assessment results from formal, standardized assessment tools are often statistically based and can be very difficult for families to understand.

Write a 500-750 word article to post on the parent page of the school’s website explaining assessment methods and the basics of statistics used in formal adaptive behavior assessments. The article should be creative and accurately explain how to read and understand assessment results by including the following:

  • Purpose, definition, and two examples of adaptive behavior assessments
  • Definition of six specialized assessment terms both of a content and statistical nature including an explanatory example of each used in formal adaptive behavior assessments
  • Explanation of at least two limitations of standardized assessments, such as bias in questionnaires, subjectivity, utility, psychometric support, etc.
  • Description of the consultative role of the special educator in helping parents/guardians understand the process of assessments and related terminology

Use easy-to-understand language and examples of assessment results with graphs, diagrams, and pictures as needed.

Support your findings with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 3 Clinical Field Experience A: Understanding Pre-Referral Assessments – The Classroom Teacher and RTI

RTI student progress data for Clinical Field Experience B is required to complete the assignment in Topic 6. Request this information from your mentor teacher prior to Clinical Field Experience B.

Response to Intervention (RTI) is a systematic pre-referral assessment process used by teachers and other school-based staff to ensure universal, targeted, and intensive individualized interventions are implemented prior to initiating the formal special education referral process. Teachers should understand the main characteristics and benefits of each tier in the RTI model. Teachers should also have knowledge and skills in recording and interpreting RTI assessment data to make data-based decisions when planning instruction and individual student interventions.

Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support the field experience.

Observe and collaborate with a certified K-5 classroom teacher about pre-referral assessments and his or her role in the RTI process.

The interview should address the following:

  • How each RTI tier is used in your classroom. What are the benefits of each tier?
  • How data is collected, and student progress monitored for RTI Tier 1, RTI Tier 2, and RTI Tier 3. Is technology used to assist in this progress monitoring? If so, how?
  • How data from RTI processes is analyzed to determine evidenced-based interventions.
  • How RTI data is used in making eligibility, program, and placement decisions for students with disabilities in your classroom.
  • Strategies you use to communicate RTI results to various stakeholders.

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class. With approval from your mentor teacher, observe RTI models used in other grade level classes in the school.

In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon your observations and collaboration, and explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice. Reflect upon using data to inform instruction and strategy selection to support struggling students and how you will use this information in your future professional practice.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Document the locations and hours you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.

Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to the LMS in the last topic. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.

 

SPD 320 Topic 3 Analyzing Student Data: The RTI Model

RTI requires progress monitoring to occur on a consistent basis to gauge the relevance and success of universal, targeted, and intensive individualized interventions being implemented. Data analysis allows teachers to make relevant decisions about individual students and advocate for new or continued placement on the RTI continuum. 

Review the “Analyzing Student Data: RTI Model Student Progress Monitoring Scenario” to inform the assignment.

In a 500-750 word analysis, complete the following:

  • Summary of overall student progress.
  • Interpret the data to determine whether Janet is responding adequately to Tier 2 instruction.
  • Why you think the support team members disagree about what tier of instruction would best meet Janet’s needs. Rationalize your answer.
  • Tier of instruction you would recommend for Janet: Tier 1 instruction only, another round of Tier 2 instruction, or intensive Tier 3 instruction? Explain your answer.

Support your analysis with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 4 Child Study Team Presentation and Handout

Child study teams provide school districts with an established structure for following screening, pre-referral, referral, and classification procedures. In turn, teachers should be knowledgeable of their role and responsibilities within the child study team process. This ensures pre-referral strategies are implemented with fidelity within the classroom setting and data is collected concerning student’s strengths and weaknesses to fully inform decision making.

Design a 10-15 slide digital presentation for general education teachers detailing the following about child study teams:

  • An engaging title section as well as appropriate text, graphics, and layout.
  • Why a child study team would be assembled and who would be a part of the team. Explain each team member’s role.
  • The differences between screening, pre-referral, and classification procedures.
  • Legal definitions and assessment requirements regarding next steps for obtaining a formal special education disability classification. Include when the team can determine that all pre-referral strategies have been exhausted and the only thing left is to refer the student for a comprehensive evaluation for formal classification under one of IDEA’s disability categories.
  • Select one of the IDEA disability categories. Identify and describe 3-4 resources teachers can use to help determine students’ strengths and weaknesses in consideration of a referral for this chosen disability category.

In addition to the presentation, create a supplemental handout that briefly explain three classroom pre-referral instructional strategies that could be used to provide documentation of targeted supports for a student not making adequate progress.

Support your findings with 2-3 scholarly resources.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 5 Next Steps: Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team

The Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET) includes educational staff and specialists who collaborate to make decisions regarding the special education eligibility and placement process. The MET decides which formal assessments to administer to gather additional data on academic, social-emotional, speech-language, or gross/fine motor concerns. Special education teachers should have a working knowledge of the roles and responsibilities of the MET including participants and their roles and responsibilities. Teachers should also be able to analyze assessment data to recommend additional assessments that should be administered by specialists, when necessary.

After reviewing the “Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET) Case Study,” reflect upon the following in a 750-1,000 word essay:

  • Who would participant in the MET? What role does each team member hold and how can these team members collaborate effectively with the student’s family and each other?
  • What background and informal assessment and observation information does the case study illustrate that might be significant to the MET? Why?
  • What additional information, not mentioned in the case study, could be gathered that might be significant to the MET? Why?
  • Recommend one formal and one informal assessment for making eligibility, program, and placement decisions, including at least one example that uses technology in one of the assessments. Justify the recommendations.
  • Support the essay with 2-3 scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located on the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 6 Clinical Field Experience B: Understanding Assessments

By administering assessments and analyzing the results, targeted and individualized interventions can be implemented to meet the needs of students with disabilities. Teachers can collect assessment data and gauge the effectiveness of designated interventions in addressing documented student needs.

Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support the field experience.

In this assignment, observe and collaborate with one or more certified K-5 classroom teachers about pre-referral assessments and his or her role in the RTI process.

Part 1: Assessment and Interventions

Select one tier of the RTI model that was discussed during Clinical Field Experience A. In collaboration with the certified K-5 classroom teacher:

  • Develop 2-3 interventions, based on RTI student assessment data provided by the mentor teacher, to support the progress of a student or small group of students in the classroom.
  • In 250-500 words, describe each intervention to include teacher, student, and family roles, and share it with your mentor teacher for feedback.
  • After incorporating the feedback from your mentor teacher, administer the interventions with the selected student(s) and provide the student with feedback on their performance.

Use any remaining field experience hours to assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

Part 2: Reflection

In 250-500 words, summarize and reflect upon your experiences developing and administering the interventions, and providing student feedback on his or her performance. Explain how you expect the interventions you developed to meet the needs of the student, incorporating his or her assessment results in your response. Explain how you will use your findings in your future professional practice.

Submit your intervention description and your reflection in a single document to your instructor.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Document the locations and hours you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.

Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to the LMS in the last topic. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.

 

SPD 320 Topic 6 Diagnostic Evaluation Assessments Matrix

Knowledge and understanding of diagnostic evaluation assessments provides a depth of knowledge for participating on school-based decision-making teams. Academic achievement and IQ assessments, adaptive behavior scales, and behavior rating scales also provide specific data and insight into the strengths and needs of students. In turn, teachers can utilize assessment results to adjust planning and instruction within the classroom.

Use the “Diagnostic Evaluation Assessment Matrix Template” to complete this assignment.

Research diagnostic evaluation assessments: Academic assessment achievement, IQ assessment, adaptive behavior scale, and behavior rating scale. For each assessment type, identify one assessment example.

Include the following:

  • Name and publication date
  • Brief description: The specific skills/knowledge assessed.
  • Age/Grade level
  • Procedures for assessing and reporting: Procedures for assessment process and reporting of information to stakeholders.
  • Types of scores yielded: Include standard scores, score ranges, percentiles, classification, degree of proficiency, etc.

Summary

Include a 250-500 word summary description of each team member role in the assessment process and planning and administering academic interventions based on assessment results. Support your findings with a minimum of four resources.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 7 Benchmark – Comprehensive Report: Summary and Recommendations

After formal assessments for determining eligibility under IDEA’s 13 disability categories are completed, school-based specialists are charged with summarizing the results to aid team decision making. In turn, specific recommendations are made to ensure school staff and family members fully understand how programming and supports should be implemented to address documented student needs. It is vital that teachers understand how to review assessment results and be an active team member in collaborating with families around the specific recommendations to be implemented. Teachers must be able to advocate for necessary programming and supports while still addressing the questions/needs of family members.

Review the “Report of Psychological Assessment: Scott Smith” to inform the assignment.

As the special education teacher, you have been tasked with summarizing Scott’s psychological report and creating a plan to help him improve his social skills and make better behavior choices in the general education setting.

Using the “Scott Smith Assessment and Recommendations Template” create a plan for Scott.

Include the following:

  • Summary: In 100-200 words, summarize the psychological report. Include specific data and observation information that will help guide Scott’s educational goals.
  • Goals: Write one behavioral goal related to classroom behavior and one social/emotional goal related to peer interaction. Goals must be measurable and include how to address the target behaviors with a replacement behavior.
  • Assessments: In 150-250 words, identify one informal or formal assessment method for measuring Scott’s progress with his behavioral and social/emotional goals. Briefly explain why the assessment is appropriate for progress monitoring, including how bias is minimized.
  • Recommendations: Based on information and assessment results in the study, in 100-250 words, include 3-4 total, specific recommendations to manage Scott’s behavior for the school, teachers, and parent, keeping information about Scott and his best interest in mind and in guiding educational decisions.
  • Rationale: In 150-250 words, justify your choices as an advocate for Scott. Make sure to explain how your summary, goals, assessment methods, and recommendations minimize bias and advocate for Scott’s needs. Support your choices with 2-3 scholarly resources.
  • Parents Collaboration and Conference Plan: Compose a 250-500 word plan explaining the Summary, Goals, Assessments, and Recommendations sections to Scott’s parents in easy-to-understand language. Support your explanations with data analyses, sharing how assessment information led to educational decisions with colleagues, and collaborating with his parents to promote student success. In addition, anticipate possible concerns his parents may have, addressing each with applicable strategies. Conclude your plan with recommendations to meet again with his parents to assess and discuss Scott’s progress.
  • Take Home Activity: In addition, create a 125-250 word take home activity for Scott’s parents, consistent with your recommendations. Using encouraging, supportive language, outline a minimum of two engaging at-home strategies for student behavior and social/emotional improvement, considering historical and family backgrounds.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies [and professional standards]:

  • COE 4.2: Select and use technically sound formal and informal assessments that minimize bias. [CEC 4.1, ICSI.4.K1, ICSI.4.K2, ICSI.4.K4. ICSI.4.S1, ICSI.4.S5, ICSI.4.S2, ICSI.4.S8, IGC.4.K1, IGC.4.K3, IGC.4.S1, IGC.4.S2, IGC.4.S3, IGC.4.S4; InTASC 6(a), 6(b), 6(h), 6(j), 6(k); GCU Mission Critical 2, 3, 5]
  • COE 4.3: Use knowledge of measurement principles and practices to interpret assessment results and guide educational decisions for individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 4.2, ICSI.4.K1, ICSI.4.K2, ICSI.4.K3, ICSI.4.K4, ICSI.4.S1, ICSI.4.S5, ICSI.4.S6, ICSI.4.S8, IGC.4.K1; InTASC 6(c), 6(k), 7(l), 7(q); GCU Mission Critical 2 and 5]
  • COE 4.4: In collaboration with colleagues and families, use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions about individuals with exceptionalities. [CEC 4.3, ICSI.4.K1, ICSI.4.K2, ICSI.4.S4, ICSI.4.S1, ICSI.4.S6, ICSI.6.K4, ICSI.7.K2, ICSI.7.K3, ICSI.7.K4, ICSI.7.S2, ICSI.7.S3, ICSI.7.S4, ICSI.7.S5, ICSI.7.S3, ICSI.7.S10, IGC.4.K1, IGC.4.K2, IGC.4.K3, IGC.7.K2, IGC.7.S2; InTASC 6(g), 6(i), 6(o), 6(t), 6(v), 9(c), 9(l) 10(a); GCU Mission Critical 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • COE 5.6: Advance the profession by engaging in activities such as advocacy and mentoring. [CEC 6.5, ICSI.6.K2, IGC.6.K4, ICSI.6.K6, ICSI.6.S1, ICSI.6.S2, ICSI.6.S4, ICSI.6.S5, ICSI.6.S6, IGC.6.K5, IGC.6.S2; InTASC 10(j); GCU Mission Critical 1, 3, 4]

 

SPD 320 Topic 8 Collaborative Learning Community – Reevaluation

The reevaluation process in special education is addressed at least every three years to determine whether the student continues to need special education and related services due to their diagnosed disability. Teachers working with students with disabilities should be aware of the rationale and purpose for the reevaluation. There are also legal provisions that must be followed to document the scope and sequence of the evaluation process. All teachers need to be aware of their role and responsibility to participate fully and be a collaborative team member with both staff and family.

This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.

Review the different reevaluation requirements under IDEA. Discuss the different types of reevaluations and associated process steps.

Design a 10-15 slide digital presentation appropriate for a schoolwide professional development opportunity on the topic of special education reevaluations for K-8.

Within your presentation, address the following:

  • Triennial reevaluations: Use of assessments to support continued eligibility, required consent, participants, and scope of the evaluation.
  • Special requests for reevaluations: Who may request, legal reasons for the request, participants, scope and purpose of the reevaluation, and key IDEA requirements related to special request reevaluations.
  • Clarification on frequently asked questions. Explain four FAQs such as: If a parent requests a reevaluation and the school thinks a reevaluation is not needed, can the school refuse to conduct the reevaluation of the child? Can the parent disagree and refuse the school’s request to reevaluate the child?
  • Terminating a student’s eligibility, including key IDEA requirements, processes, and steps regarding determining and communicating that a student is no longer eligible. Include the two exceptions to requirements for reevaluation under IDEA regarding a change in eligibility for a student.
  • A title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Support your presentation with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

SPD 320 Topic 8 Clinical Field Experience Verification Form*

Candidates must complete all programmatic requirements, including practicum/field experience hours defined in the coursework. Additional information about practicum/field experience can be found in the Student Success Center.

To earn credit for this assignment, all required course hours must be completed and the form submitted by the assignment due date.

  • Access the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form in the Document Management section in the Student Portal.
  • Complete all required fields on the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.
  • Submit by clicking “Click to Sign.” An email will be sent to the mentor to verify the practicum/field experience hours.
  • Communicate with the mentor to request he or she verify the practicum/field experience hours. Once the practicum/field experience hours have been verified by the mentor, the completed form will be available in the Student Portal.
  • Save a .pdf copy of the completed Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to your computer.
  • Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to the LMS.

*The data entered into this document is subject to a verification audit. Candidates who engage in fabricating, falsifying, forging, altering, or inventing information related to practicum/field experiences, internships, clinical practice, and/or any associated documentation may be subject to sanctions for violating GCU academic integrity policies, which may include expulsion from GCU.

 

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Related products

  • Placeholder

    What assessments can be used to assess problematic social behaviors

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    MGT 660 Topic 8 Discussions GCU

    $18 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    SPD 320 All Discussions GCU

    $150 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    Consider the various informal assessment types commonly used in classroom

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    How do the purposes of academic, psychological, and speech-language evaluations

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    SPD 320 Topic 2 Parent Newsletter Article GCU

    $40 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    Alexander is a second grade student. His teacher, having administered a universal

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    Describe three requirements that reevaluation shares with the initial

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    SPD 320 Assessment and Eligibility in Special Education GCU

    $400 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    Research a school district in your area. How does the district conduct

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    Social and emotional well-being is important for students to be confident

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    SPD 320 Topic 3 Clinical Field Experience A GCU

    $40 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    SPD 320 Topic 1 Assessment Process to Establish Eligibility GCU

    $40 Add to cart
Categories
  • ACC 2409
  • ACC 25017
  • ACC 35012
  • ACC 37012
  • ACC 37111
  • ACC 46016
  • ACC 48519
  • ACC 48611
  • ACC 4913
  • ACC 61311
  • ACC 61624
  • ACC 62219
  • ACC 65011
  • ACC 65111
  • ACC 66018
  • ACC 66211
  • ACC 66411
  • ACC 66511
  • ACC 66719
  • ACC 66819
  • ACC 6901
  • ACC 6919
  • ADM 6141
  • ADM 6241
  • ADM 6261
  • ADM 6321
  • ADM 6341
  • ADM 6361
  • AMP 41511
  • AMP 42511
  • AMP 4341
  • AMP 450V6
  • AMP 49211
  • BIO 22010
  • BIO 31610
  • BIO 50017
  • BIO 5509
  • BUS 34011
  • BUS 35223
  • BUS 37219
  • BUS 48511
  • BUS 62312
  • BUS 66019
  • COM 23110
  • COM 26325
  • COM 31511
  • COM 36221
  • CWV 1018
  • DNP 81028
  • DNP 81515
  • DNP 83025
  • DNP 83518
  • DNP 84021
  • DNP 95511
  • DNP 9609
  • ECH 5201
  • ECN 22025
  • ECN 35119
  • ECN 36021
  • ECN 45019
  • ECN 60122
  • ECS 50118
  • ECS 55513
  • ECS 56016
  • ECS 57015
  • ECS 59020
  • EDU 33019
  • EED 4751
  • ELM 20018
  • ELM 30522
  • ELM 35012
  • ELM 35123
  • ELM 54018
  • EMM 4155
  • EMM 44211
  • EMM 64111
  • ENG 10639
  • ENT 43520
  • FIN 35019
  • FIN 45011
  • FIN 45111
  • FIN 65030
  • Finance53
  • HCA 61017
  • HCA 62016
  • HCA 67511
  • HCA 80715
  • HCA 81216
  • HCA 82215
  • HCI 60017
  • HLT 205V10
  • HLT 30213
  • HLT 306V14
  • HLT 307V3
  • HLT 308V7
  • HLT 310V12
  • HLT 312V7
  • HLT 313V8
  • HLT 314V6
  • HLT 317V10
  • HLT 324V12
  • HLT 362V16
  • HLT 418V8
  • HLT 51517
  • HLT 52020
  • HLT 54011
  • HLT 60017
  • HLT 60517
  • INT 24417
  • JUS 1109
  • JUS 50524
  • JUS 51037
  • JUS 5153
  • JUS 52011
  • JUS 52111
  • JUS 52416
  • JUS 53134
  • JUS 6102
  • JUS 6209
  • LDR 46215
  • LDR 60026
  • LDR 61515
  • LDR 62012
  • LDR 63023
  • LDR 6401
  • LDR 80416
  • MAT 1348
  • MAT 15012
  • MGT 24010
  • MGT 42011
  • MGT 43411
  • MGT 45511
  • MGT 60511
  • MGT 65512
  • MGT 66019
  • MGT 8109
  • MGT 8154
  • MIN 82214
  • MIS 60018
  • MIS 61019
  • MIS 66019
  • MIS 66520
  • MIS 69021
  • MKT 24510
  • MKT 31515
  • MKT 45029
  • MKT 60738
  • NRS 410V8
  • NRS 427V6
  • NRS 429V8
  • NRS 430V8
  • NRS 433V9
  • NRS 434V8
  • NRS 437V7
  • NRS 4408
  • NRS 4418
  • NRS 451V13
  • NRS 49015
  • NRS 493 GCU47
  • NUR 50211
  • NUR 50419
  • NUR 50811
  • NUR 647E14
  • NUR 67046
  • NUR 69926
  • PCN 50011
  • PCN 50111
  • PCN 52011
  • PCN 6051
  • PHI 10510
  • PHI 413V18
  • POS 50014
  • PSC 4109
  • PSC 4957
  • PSY 1009
  • PSY 10228
  • PSY 52023
  • PSY 53019
  • PSY 55015
  • PSY 62211
  • PSY 65510
  • PSY 6621
  • PSY 66314
  • PSY 8603
  • RES 8618
  • RES 866 GCU2
  • RES 88519
  • RSD 8511
  • SMM7
  • SOC 10055
  • SOC 2201
  • SOC 38617
  • SOC 4129
  • SOC 44518
  • SOC 44917
  • SPD 31021
  • SPD 32014
  • SYM 50611
  • TCH 5171
  • TCH 5241
  • TCH 53910
  • TSL 53215
  • TSL 55012
  • TSL 55214
  • TSL 55813
  • TSL 56715
  • Uncategorized11
  • UNV 10315
  • UNV 10411
  • UNV 5027
  • UNV 503V6
  • UNV 5047

Tutorials Experts is a US based tutorials company head quartered into Delaware. We aim to provide study help with load of knowledge for every program being studied into Grand Canyon University.
Services
Custom Essay Writing
Research Paper Writing
Dissertation Writing Service
Social Media
Coursework Writing
Term Paper Writing
Contacts
Adress: 2803 Philadelphia Pike, Suite B #1121, Claymont, DE 19703.
Website: https://tutorialsexperts.com/
Email: support@tutorialsexperts.com
Phone: +1 315 765 7646
Fax: +1 315 765 7646
Newsletter

Signup for our newsletter and stay connected with our recent discounts and promotions.

Terms of use | Privacy Environmental Policy
  • Shop
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • My Account

Copyright © 2022 Tutorials Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The products and services provided by Tutorials Experts are for research and guidance purposes only. Students are solely responsible for doing their own work and using the materials provided as a reference.

WhatsApp us